|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Recertification RefresherAcute ischemic strokeswift assessment and quick action produce optimal outcomes
Carolyn Hewko, MS, PA-CMs. Hewko practices at Eastern Connecticut Cardiology Group in New London, Conn. The author has indicated no relationships to disclose relating to the content of this article.The twin goals of an acute evaluation are to prevent further acute brain injury and to forestall potentially devastating neurologic sequelae.
The term stroke describes a clinical diagnosis of observed loss of neurologic function due to ischemia following acute loss of circulation.1 Stroke is third most common killer of American adults and accounted for more than 1 of every 15 deaths in the United States in 2001; approximately half of these deaths occurred out of the hospital.2 Despite the high incidence of stroke, nearly two thirds of Americans are unable to identify a single warning sign of this common killer.3 The twin goals of an acute evaluation are to prevent further acute brain injury (or reverse current damaging events) and to prevent neurologic sequelae. The various possible etiologies and presentations of stroke require that clinicians keep a low threshold of suspicion of this entity (see "The anatomy and physiology of ischemic stroke").
First, a rapid assessmentA three-step process guides the evaluation of a patient with a suspected stroke: diagnosis, localization, and mechanism.4 The diagnostic workup can begin when the patient has been stabilized with oxygen and appropriate support and a cardiac assessment has been performed.3 The differential diagnosis of stroke includes tumor, intoxication, brain injury, seizures, hypoglycemia, syncope, electrolyte imbalance, drug effects, migraine headache, Meniere's disease, and psychiatric disorders.1 A focused history and physical exam, described below, rule out these problems. Treatment for stroke depends on whether the cause is hemorrhagic or ischemic, so the initial workup of suspected stroke is focused on determining the type.1 The patient's demographic profile, the medical history, and the physical exam provide initial clues to the etiology,2 which can then be pursued with brain, carotid artery, or heart imaging studies together with specific laboratory tests. Antiplatelet or thrombolytic treatment for a confirmed ischemic stroke may be initiated before an exact etiology is determined. The history and physical examThe first and most important step in evaluating a patient suspected of having an acute stroke is taking a thorough, immediate history, including identification and social, family, and medical histories. Both sex and ethnicity can be important etiologic clues; men and postmenopausal women are at a higher risk for hemorrhagic stroke, and persons of African, Chinese, and Japanese heritage have higher rates of vascular occlusive disease and hypertension, which are risk factors for ischemic stroke. The patient's medical history also may offer important clues. Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) can cause atherosclerosis of the extracranial vessels and increase the risk of ischemic stroke. A history of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) with symptoms that were similar to those now present strongly suggests a thrombotic occlusive process.5 A history of severe, uncontrolled hypertension suggests a possible intracranial hemorrhage. A history of cardiac problems such as heart failure, rheumatic heart disease, myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation, dilated cardiomyopathy, valvular lesions, bacterial endocarditis, atrial-septal defect, and aortic aneurysm suggests possible cardioembolism.5,6 With the relevant demographic data and medical history in hand, the clinician should determine the patient's activity at symptom onset, the temporal relationship of symptom progression, and whether either headache or loss of consciousness occurred.5 Embolisms frequently occur when the patient coughs, sneezes, rises during the night to urinate, or during activities performed soon after rising, such as showering.5 These embolic lesions typically manifest as a completed stroke with maximal deficit at onset.7 A hemorrhagic etiology is suggested by onset during exertion, neck rigidity, a decreasing level of consciousness or somnolence, headache, vomiting, and seizures.8 A lacunar thrombosis is suggested, however, if these same symptoms gradually worsen or if the patient has progressive debilitation (evolving stroke).9 The physical exam should include the cardiovascular and neurologic systems, with close attention paid to the extremities.3,9 A diagnosis of cardioembolism is suggested by telltale signs from the heart and extremities; particular attention must be paid not only to detecting murmurs, but also to the character and quality of all heart sounds and carotid bruits.5,9 The facial arteries on the lower jaw and superficial temporal arteries should be palpated for stenosis and symmetry.5 Cyanotic, cold, or gangrenous fingers or toes indicate embolism or severe peripheral vascular disease, while small peripheral nodules are a sign of endocarditis.5 A funduscopic retinal exam is useful for finding end-organ damage from hypertension or diabetes.4 Signs of hyperlipidemia, including xanthomata and corneal arcus, can also be noted.4 A full neurologic assessment is the focus of the physical examination. Higher cortical function may be evaluated by asking the patient to read aloud or write a brief paragraph, to name objects, and to repeat a phrase or sentence.5 The National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing prognosis and also can help to localize the lesion (see Figure 1). The six focal points of the NIHSS include level of consciousness, visual function, motor function, sensation, neglect, cerebellar function, and language. A score greater than 20 indicates a severe neurologic deficit.
Confirming the diagnosisAn early imaging study is required to differentiate ischemia from hemorrhage so that appropriate treatment may be initiated rapidly. The ideal imaging modality for stroke must be able to rule out intracranial hemorrhage, confirm ischemic pathology, (intracranial artery disease, ischemic tissue injury, decreasing perfusion), and require no more than 20 minutes.10 Although magnetic resonance plus diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), and MR angiography meet these criteria,10 CT is the preferred imaging study in the emergency department (ED) because of its speed, availability, and ability to confirm bleeding (despite its inability to confirm ischemia).11,12 MRI is more sensitive at detecting early infarct but is more expensive than CT. A suspected cardioembolism must be investigated with chest radiography13,14 and with continuous ECG for intermittent atrial fibrillation. Transesophageal echocardiography is the most sensitive test for cardioembolic sources.13 A CBC, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum electrolyte values, liver function tests, serum glucose levels, and a coagulation profile should be obtained to rule out anemia, polycythemia, hypercoagulable states, and infection.15 Serum homocysteine levels and a complete hematologic workup may be indicated in a young patient to rule out premature atherosclerotic disease.2 Treating the ischemic attack: Emergent care and afterAntiplatelet therapy continues to be the mainstay of treatment for ischemic stroke. Aspirin administered within 48 hours of symptom onset and continued for 10 to 28 days has been shown to reduce death and both long- and short-term dependency.13,16 Ticlopidine (Ticlid), 250 mg twice a day, clopidrogrel (Plavix), 75 mg/d, and the combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (Aggrenox) are also effective therapies in some patients.17 Studies have shown both fewer recurrences and a better side-effect profile with antiplatelet agents than with other drugs. A low dosage of aspirin (75-150 mg/d) is protective and forestalls the apparent dosage-related effects of dyspepsia and constipation.18 In addition to its role in the treatment of acute stroke, antiplatelet therapy has a role in preventing subsequent strokes. A meta-analysis showed a 25% reduction in serious vascular events among patients using antiplatelet therapy who had had an acute stroke or vascular disease.18 With the relatively low risk of complications on low-dosage antiplatelet therapy, this should be a mainstay of prevention after a stroke, an MI, or a TIA and in patients at high risk for stroke. In a landmark trial, 624 patients with stroke were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or placebo.19 Those patients who received rt-PA were found to be at least 30% more likely to have minimal or no disability at 3 and 12 months than were the placebo-treated patients, and mortality at 12 months was not significantly different between the rt-PA group and the placebo group. The results indicated a sustained benefit of rt-PA. The only FDA-approved agent for acute ischemic stroke is rt-PA in dosages of 0.9 mg/kg up to a maximum of 90 mg; 10% of the total dose is given as a bolus, and the remainder is infused over 1 hour. No other drugs that affect coagulation (including heparin, warfarin, or aspirin) should be given for 24 hours after initiation of rt-PA therapy (see Table 1). Only a small percentage of stroke patients are candidates for rt-PA therapy, however, because of time constraints and risks associated with administering the drug in error to patients with hemorrhagic rather than ischemic stroke.
In addition to administering appropriate drug therapy to treat ischemia in the ED, important hospital care includes encouraging early patient mobility and self-care, facilitating communication in patients who have aphasia, and initiating rehabilitation.20 The complications and sequelae of strokeCardiac and pulmonary problems are the most common complications of acute ischemic stroke and are an important cause of secondary morbidity and mortality.21 Approximately half of patients who have had a stroke will also have CAD; MI or other ischemia will complicate 3% of hospital stays for stroke patients.21 Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are also important causes of death in patients with acute stroke. Prophylaxis includes early ambulation if possible, antiembolism stockings, and aspirin. Electrical stimulation and external pneumatic calf compression devices are also effective.21,22 Aspiration pneumonia kills 6% of patients with acute stroke; dysphagia must be addressed with postural or dietary changes or with swallowing exercises.22 Decubitus ulcers occur in 14.5% of hospitalized stroke patients.20 Important measures to prevent ulcers include putting stroke patients on flat beds, repositioning them every 2 hours, providing body support, applying lotion, and using gel pads to keep their skin cool and dry. Adequate nutrition is also an important management goal; half of stroke victims in inpatient rehabilitation centers are malnourished. Hypoalbuminemia and hyperglycemia are important problems to watch for and correct.20 Prevention and patient educationAlthough some risk factors for stroke are modifiable, such as hypertension, others are not (see Table 2).
Hypertension Controlling BP is the most important factor in risk reduction, and the degree of hypertension is proportional to the increased risk of stroke. In the United Kingdom TIA (UK-TIA) trial, risk for recurrent stroke increased by 28% for every 10 mm Hg increase in BP above 120/80 mm Hg.21 Recently issued guidelines from the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) have established 120/80 mm Hg as the upper limit for normal BP.22 Researchers in the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) sought to determine the best antihypertensive therapy in patients within 5 years of either a TIA or a stroke. The researchers found that use of a diuretic added to perindopril reduced the risk of stroke;23 an ideal antihypertension regimen seems to be an ACE inhibitor combined with a diuretic. Atrial fibrillation Twenty to 30 million Americans have atrial fibrillation,24 which is likely to be associated with 15% of all ischemic strokes and with 30% of those in the elderly.20 Because atrial fibrillation has been shown to be an independent risk factor for embolic stroke, it should be medically treated; both warfarin (Coumadin) and aspirin are used (see Table 3).25
Hyperlipidemia Statins, particularly pravastatin (Pravachol) and simvastatin (Zocor), have been beneficial for secondary stroke prevention, even among patients whose serum cholesterol levels are within normal reference ranges. A large meta-analysis of nonstatin cholesterol-lowering agents did not, however, show a stroke-reducing effect.26 Carotid stenosis This condition may be responsible for 20% to 30% of strokes.24 Carotid endarterectomy is an important therapeutic modality in many patients because even with medical management, including aspirin, 325 mg/d, there is still a 10% risk of ipsilateral stroke within 5 years of the diagnosis. Patient education about risk factors and their management are the keys to stroke prevention. For example, cigarette smoking directly increases the risk of stroke, but that risk decreases 2 to 5 years after smoking cessation. As little as several hours a week of moderate physical activity can counteract the risk for stroke associated with a sedentary lifestyle. 24
REFERENCES 1. Jauch EC. Acute stroke management. eMedicine.com. 2002:1-32. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/neuro/topic9.htm . Accessed June 16, 2004. 2. American Heart Association. 2002 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, 2004 Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 2003. 3. Selman WR, Tarr R. Landis DM. Brain attack: emergency treatment of ischemic stroke. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55:2655-2662,2665,2666. 4. Hill MD, Buchan AM. Posterior cerebral artery stroke. eMedicine.com. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/neuro/topic322.htm . Accessed June 16, 2004. 5. Diagnosis and the clinical encounter. In: Caplan LR. Stroke: A Clinical Approach. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:67-99. 6. Libman R, Wein T. "Newer" cardiac sources of embolic stroke. Neurolog. September 1999;5:231-246. 7. Ischemic syndromes. In: Beers MH, Berkow R, eds. The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy. 17th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck; 1999:1-7. 8. Inzitari D, Eliaszin M, Sharpe BL, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of patients with carotid artery stenosis presenting with lacunar stroke. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group. Neurology. 2000;54:660-666. 9. Weiner WJ, Goetz CG, eds. Neurology for the Non-Neurologist. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. 10. Ingall TJ. Preventing ischemic stroke: current approaches to primary and secondary prevention. Postgrad Med. May 2000;107:34-36, 39-42, 47-50. 11. Hacke W, Warach S. Diffusion-weighed MRI as an evolving standard of care in acute stroke. Neurology. 2000;54:1548,1549. 12. Phillips P. Improved stroke imaging techniques. JAMA. 1999;281:2073,2074. 13. Gubitz G, Sandercock P. Acute ischaemic stroke. BMJ. 2000;320:692-696. 14. Cerebrovascular disease. In: Gilroy J. Basic Neurology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division; 2000: 231,232, 235-237. 15. Baird A. Anterior circulation stroke. eMedicine.com. 2002:1-19. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/neuro/topic16.htm. Accessed June 16, 2004. 16. Coull BM, Williams LS, Goldstein LB, et al. Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in acute ischemic stroke: Report of the Joint Stroke Guideline Development Committee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke Association (a division of the American Heart Association). Neurology. 2002;59(1):13-21. 17. Albers GW. Choice of endpoints in antiplatelet trials: which outcomes are most relevant to stroke patients? Neurology. 2000;54:1022-1028. 18. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324:71-86. 19. Kwiatkowski TG, Libman RB, Frankel M, et al. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke at one year. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1781-1787. 20. Geis C, Gricson S. Rehabilitation medicine issues in acute stroke: prevention of common complications, facilitation of recovery, and assessment of rehabilitation potential. Neurolog. 1997;35:323-330. 21. Messerli FH, Hanly DF Jr, Gorelick PB. Blood pressure control in stroke patients: what should the consulting neurologist advise? Neurology. July 2002;59:23-25. 22. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7). US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. May 2003. NIH publication 03-5233. 23. Bosch J, Yusuf S, Pogue J, et al. Use of ramipril in preventing stroke: double blind randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;324:699-702. 24. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001; 285:2370-2375. 25. Mohr JP, Thompson JL, Lazar RM, et al. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1444-1451. 26. Kissela BM, Broderick JP. Management of hyperlipidemia and stroke. Neurolog. 2000;6(3):160-170.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||